Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 und Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
- Etwa 4% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1071 vs 1022
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1045 vs 988
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 352
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 650 vs 601
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.273 vs 0.27
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.747 vs 20.086
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.082 vs 0.079
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.586 vs 0.559
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.055 vs 1.963
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1071 vs 1022 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1045 vs 988 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 vs 352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 650 vs 601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.273 vs 0.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.747 vs 20.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.082 vs 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.586 vs 0.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.055 vs 1.963 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 | 1071 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 988 | 1045 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 357 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 | 650 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.27 | 0.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.086 | 21.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 | 0.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | 0.586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.963 | 2.055 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Startdatum | 10 January 2008 | 10 January 2008 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $316 | $530 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3171 | 3140 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $57.99 | |
| Prozessornummer | T9300 | T9500 |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 8.48 | |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2.50 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Matrizengröße | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Frontseitiger Bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 6144 KB | 6144 KB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 1.000V-1.250V | 1.000V-1.250V |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Gehäusegröße | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | PGA478, BGA479 | BGA479, PPGA478, PGA478 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| FSB-Parität | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||