Intel Core i5-5675C vs AMD PRO A10-9700E
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-5675C und AMD PRO A10-9700E Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5675C
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.60 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2211 vs 1438
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 5714 vs 3027
- 2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 989 vs 493
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3577 vs 1490
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3147 vs 1158
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 vs 1368
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3147 vs 1158
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 vs 1368
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 vs 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5714 vs 3027 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 vs 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 vs 1490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 vs 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 vs 1368 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A10-9700E
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 vs 3.323
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 vs 75.856
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 vs 0.432
- 40.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 vs 0.601
- 11.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 vs 6.401
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4350 vs 3360
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4350 vs 3360
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 vs 3.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 vs 75.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 vs 0.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 vs 0.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 vs 6.401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 vs 3360 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: AMD PRO A10-9700E
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 | 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5714 | 3027 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | 1490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | 15.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | 248.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | 1.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | 24.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | 74.999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 4350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 1368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 4350 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD PRO A10-9700E | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | |
| Startdatum | Q2'15 | 3 October 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1273 | 1246 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | R7 |
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-5675C mit anderen
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-9700KF
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G4950
