AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R5 Graphics und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- 3.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
| Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 5.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1020 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Etwa 36% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.9x mehr Texturfüllrate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 256
- 2.9x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,111 gflops vs 388.1 gflops
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 2981
- 5.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 6.331
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 119.568
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 0.543
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 12.649
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 42.459
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 966
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1363
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1915
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 966
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1363
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1915
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 256 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,111 gflops vs 388.1 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 vs 2981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 6.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 vs 119.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 vs 0.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 12.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 vs 42.459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1915 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Codename | Wani | GM107 |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1551 | 724 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $150.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 800 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 388.1 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 256 | 512 |
| Texturfüllrate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 512 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
| Speichertyp | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche AMD Radeon R5 Graphics mit anderen
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
IntelUHD Graphics 605
