AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 5.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 256
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 388.1 gflops
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 versus 2981
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 6.331
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 versus 119.568
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 versus 0.543
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 12.649
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 versus 42.459
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 966
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 1363
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 1915
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 966
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 1363
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 1915
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 388.1 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 versus 2981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 6.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 versus 119.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 versus 0.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 12.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 versus 42.459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 1915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Wani | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 724 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
IntelUHD Graphics 605
