AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 41% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1138 MHz
- Etwa 52% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Texturfüllrate: 304.8 GT/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16357 vs 12354
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 828
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77476 vs 61796
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 153.117
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 1722.138
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 11.901
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 126.528
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1172.788
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 12822
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 12822
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1138 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 vs 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 828 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 vs 61796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 11.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 126.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1172.788 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3353 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Etwa 7% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 210 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 828 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 | 61796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 11.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 126.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1172.788 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 162 | 239 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 210 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 9,677 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1572 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |