AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 18% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 13% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16535 vs 14146
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 747
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77231 vs 71612
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 217.04
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3119.736
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 21.707
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 133.975
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1141.283
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9470 vs 7482
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 vs 14146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77231 vs 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 vs 7482 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Etwa 41% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 160 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 14699
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3720
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3369
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 14699
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3720
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3369
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3369 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 | 14146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77231 | 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 | 7482 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $349 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 160 | 159 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $349.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 160 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 1920 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 2 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 229 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |