AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1138 MHz
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 304.8 GT/s versus 302.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16357 versus 12354
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 versus 828
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77476 versus 61796
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 153.117
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 1722.138
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 11.901
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 126.528
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1172.788
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 12822
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 12822
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 14 August 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1138 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s versus 302.4 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 versus 12354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 versus 828 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 versus 61796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 153.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 1722.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 11.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 126.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1172.788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 versus 12822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 versus 12822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | 12354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 828 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 | 61796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 153.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 1722.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 11.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 126.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1172.788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 12822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 12822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 162 | 239 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1138 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,677 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon 760M
