AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 6% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 vs 912
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 159.275
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 vs 912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 159.275 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Etwa 5% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 215 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18812 vs 16653
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102789 vs 77152
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 252.601
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 24.769
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 1322.129
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 14699
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3720
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3369
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 14699
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3720
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3369
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10960 vs 9482
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18812 vs 16653 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102789 vs 77152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10960 vs 9482 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16653 | 18812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77152 | 102789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9482 | 10960 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 148 | 97 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $749.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 215 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 13,600 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2944 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |