AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 versus 912
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 159.275
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 versus 912 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3938.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 159.275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18812 versus 16653
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102789 versus 77152
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 252.601
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 24.769
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1322.129
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 14699
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3720
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3369
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 14699
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3720
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3369
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10960 versus 9482
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18812 versus 16653 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102789 versus 77152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 24.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1322.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3369 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10960 versus 9482 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16653 | 18812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 | 912 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77152 | 102789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3938.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9482 | 10960 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 97 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 13,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 2944 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon 760M
