AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 912
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 159.275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 159.275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18813 vs 16661
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102655 vs 77153
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 252.601
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 24.769
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 1322.129
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 14699
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3720
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3369
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 14699
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3720
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3369
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10963 vs 9483
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18813 vs 16661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102655 vs 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10963 vs 9483 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16661 | 18813 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 102655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9483 | 10963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 147 | 97 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |