AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und NVIDIA TITAN V Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 34% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 31% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Etwa 11% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3583.136
- 12.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 20.669
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN V
- Etwa 53% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 16357
- 2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 vs 77476
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 252.601
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 24.769
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1322.129
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 14699
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3369
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 14699
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3369
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3565 vs 2134
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 465.6 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 vs 16357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 vs 77476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 24.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1322.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 vs 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 vs 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3369 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 vs 2134 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | 19673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 | 155548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 | 3565 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | RDNA | Volta |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $2,999 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 162 | 157 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 21,100 million |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,899 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
| Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1700 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
