AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 27% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1465 MHz vs 1156 MHz
- Etwa 17% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1471 MHz
- Etwa 17% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 210 Watt
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14341 vs 13093
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 878 vs 768
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 184.405
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1765.06
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 12.606
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 79.32
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 1022.925
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1862 vs 1501
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz vs 1156 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1471 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14341 vs 13093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 vs 768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 vs 1501 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- 1328.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 66313
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 11536
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 11536
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 330.00 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 vs 66313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 vs 11536 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14341 | 13093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66313 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 | 1501 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 201 | 224 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | 56 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | 21 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | 10.5 TFLOPs |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | 94.00 GP/s |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 3584 |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | 256 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 210 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | 650 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 410 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |