AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Etwa 39% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 878 vs 725
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66313 vs 63932
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 194.277
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1916.09
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 17.951
- 7.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 31.471
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 545.751
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 vs 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66313 vs 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Etwa 59% höhere Texturfüllrate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 14341
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11536
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11536
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1862
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 14341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1862 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14341 | 15451 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 | 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66313 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 | 8770 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | RDNA | Pascal |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GP102 |
| Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $5,999 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 201 | 204 |
| Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
| Jetzt kaufen | $4,403.52 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 11,800 million |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 12,634 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | |
| Leitungssysteme | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | |
| Multi-Display-Synchronisation | Quadro Sync II | |
| Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Länge | 267 mm | |
| SLI-Optionen | 1 | |
| Breite | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 9016 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||