AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Etwa 39% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 730
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66142 vs 64134
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 194.277
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1916.09
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 17.951
- 7.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 31.471
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 545.751
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 730 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66142 vs 64134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Etwa 59% höhere Texturfüllrate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15478 vs 14362
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11536
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11536
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1866
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15478 vs 14362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 11536 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1866 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14362 | 15478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 730 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66142 | 64134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1866 | 8770 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Pascal |
Codename | Navi 10 | GP102 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $5,999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 203 | 207 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $4,403.52 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 11,800 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 12,634 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | |
Multi-Display-Synchronisation | Quadro Sync II | |
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1 x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
SLI-Optionen | 1 | |
Breite | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 9016 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |