AMD Radeon Vega 10 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 10 und NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 10
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 226
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9587 vs 6059
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3402 vs 1692
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3235 vs 3011
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3402 vs 1692
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3235 vs 3011
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 26 October 2017 vs 11 January 2017 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9587 vs 6059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 vs 3079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 vs 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3235 vs 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 vs 3079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 vs 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3235 vs 3011 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
- 4.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1881 vs 1556
Spezifikationen | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1881 vs 1556 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 10
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 10 | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1556 | 1881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9587 | 6059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 357.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 | 3079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 | 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3235 | 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 | 3079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 | 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3235 | 3011 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 797 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Vega 10 | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Vega | Maxwell |
Codename | Vega Raven Ridge | GM108 |
Startdatum | 26 October 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 956 | 957 |
Typ | Laptop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1400 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1041 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 799.5 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | |
Texturfüllrate | 16.66 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) |