Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 und AMD Radeon R9 M390 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 vs 1232
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 1232
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 10 July 2019 vs 09 June 2015 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 vs 1232 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20353 vs 6378
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2992
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2992
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2792
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2792
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 vs 6378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2792 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6378 | 20353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 6227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 6227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN |
Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | Pitcairn |
Startdatum | 10 July 2019 | 09 June 2015 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 841 | 842 |
Typ | Laptop | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1150 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 48 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | Yes | |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Technologien |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore |