Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 versus AMD Radeon R9 M390
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon R9 M390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 versus 1232
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 versus 1232
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 July 2019 versus 09 June 2015 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 versus 1232 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20353 versus 6378
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 2992
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 2992
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 2792
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 2792
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 versus 6378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 2792 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6378 | 20353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 6227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 6227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT3e | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 10 July 2019 | 09 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 841 | 842 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Yes | |
| HDMI | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Technologies |
||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5650
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
ATIRadeon X600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
