Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 10.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 160 Watt
Startdatum | 2 Sep 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 4.6x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 53% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1680 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1920 vs 384
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 2666
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 383
- 6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 11991
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 79.859
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 1137.615
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 4.569
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 61.688
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 192.566
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 5609
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3708
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3356
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 5609
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3708
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1680 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 1920 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 11991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 vs 79.859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 vs 1137.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 vs 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 vs 61.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 192.566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | TU106 |
Startdatum | 2 Sep 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 594 | 161 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $349 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $349.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 48 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 160 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10,800 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 2 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Breite | IGP | |
Länge | 229 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |