Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 12 nm
- 10.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 160 Watt
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 7 January 2019 |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 4.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 5x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 384
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 2666
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 383
- 6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 11991
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 79.859
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 1137.615
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 4.569
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 61.688
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 192.566
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 5609
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3708
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3356
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 5609
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3708
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 11991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 79.859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 1137.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 61.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 192.566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 161 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |