Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics P630 und AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 32x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 128 GB vs 4 GB
Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB vs 4 GB |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- 3.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1090 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 37.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 896 vs 24
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 20.49
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 387.561
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.089
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 24.713
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 37.743
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 2010
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2344 vs 2273
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3019
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 2010
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2344 vs 2273
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3019
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1090 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 896 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 vs 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 vs 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 vs 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 vs 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3019 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 44.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 785.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 3.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 65.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 196.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 5269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 5269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3357 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1072 | 816 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | |
Codename | Baffin | |
Startdatum | 27 September 2016 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 896 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,150 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Texturfüllrate | 57.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,000 million | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 112.0 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None |