Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 4 GB
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 37.3x plus de pipelines: 896 versus 24
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 versus 20.49
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 versus 387.561
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 versus 2.089
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 versus 24.713
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 versus 37.743
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 versus 2010
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2344 versus 2273
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3019
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 versus 2010
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2344 versus 2273
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3019
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 versus 24 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 versus 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 versus 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 versus 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 versus 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 versus 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 versus 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 versus 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 44.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 785.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 3.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 65.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 196.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 5269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 5269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1072 | 816 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
Nom de code | Baffin | |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 896 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |