NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 7.4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 19 Watt vs 140 Watt
Startdatum | 27 March 2014 vs 6 September 2012 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:980 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 5.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 960 vs 192
- 5.4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,981 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 6.0 GB/s vs 1.8 GB/s
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 623
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 212
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 1946
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 6.705
- 7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 100.391
- 7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.441
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 8.146
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 20.64
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 977
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1494
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1833
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 977
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1494
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1833
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 192
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 980 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 960 vs 192 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,981 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6.0 GB/s vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 vs 192 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 4017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 1307 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Codename | GK208B | GK106 |
Startdatum | 27 March 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $34.99 | $229 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1488 | 740 |
Jetzt kaufen | $34.99 | $349.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.15 | 14.35 |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 192 | 960 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 366.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
Leitungssysteme | 192 | 960 |
Texturfüllrate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt | 140 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 292 million | 2,540 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1033 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display-Anschlüsse | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Höhe | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | One 6-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1.8 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |