NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 7.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 140 Watt
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 954 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 192
- 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6.0 GB/s versus 1.8 GB/s
- 6.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 623
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 212
- 5.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 1946
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 6.705
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 100.391
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 0.441
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 8.146
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 versus 20.64
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 977
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1494
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 1833
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 977
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1494
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 1833
- 6.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 192
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 623 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 212 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 versus 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 1833 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 192 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | $229 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 740 |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | $349.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | 14.35 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
