NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 8160
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 444
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 vs 31098
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 111.55
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 vs 19.803
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3654
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3654
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 vs 8160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 vs 31098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 vs 111.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 vs 19.803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3654 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Etwa 9% höhere Texturfüllrate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- Etwa 11% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 1152
- Etwa 9% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,275 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 1325.07
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 8.057
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 425.709
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 10566
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3338
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 10566
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3338
- 23.6x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 156
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,275 gflops vs 3,935 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 vs 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 425.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 vs 156 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 | 8160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 | 31098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 111.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 1371.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 8.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 19.803 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 509.222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 | 3677 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Pascal |
| Codename | GP106 | GP106B |
| Startdatum | 18 August 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 | $237.11 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 388 | 385 |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Jetzt kaufen | $229.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1708 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,935 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 1152 | 1280 |
| Texturfüllrate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,400 million | 4,400 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 1280 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 94 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 250 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 192.2 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtuelle Realität | ||
| VR Ready | ||

