NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9777 versus 8161
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 versus 444
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32371 versus 31072
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 111.55
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 versus 19.803
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 3654
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 3654
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9777 versus 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32371 versus 31072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 versus 19.803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 3654 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Environ 9% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 133.6 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1152
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,275 gflops versus 3,935 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 1325.07
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 8.057
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 425.709
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 10566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3338
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 10566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3338
- 23.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 versus 159
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 1152 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops versus 3,935 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 versus 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 425.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 versus 159 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9777 | 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32371 | 31072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 159 | 3677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP106 | GP106B |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $237.11 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 392 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 4,400 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |