NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER und NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 vs 34.491
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10550
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10550
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3343 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 178.926
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 1940.024
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 11.167
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 802.026
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 178.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 1940.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 11.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 802.026 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 255.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 2621.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 21.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 34.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 1376.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | |
Codename | TU116 | |
Startdatum | 22 Nov 2019 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 269 | 318 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 138.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | |
CUDA-Kerne | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | DisplayPort, HDMI |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5 in |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 4.4 in | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |