NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1046 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Etwa 71% höhere Texturfüllrate: 134 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Etwa 60% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1536 vs 960
- Etwa 68% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 3,333 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- 1168.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 vs 4017
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 487
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18068 vs 11364
- Etwa 63% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 vs 30.505
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 vs 705.293
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 vs 3.085
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.06 vs 35.416
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.884 vs 62.69
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 vs 3581
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 vs 3581
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 vs 1307
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 May 2013 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1046 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 134 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec |
| Leitungssysteme | 1536 vs 960 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,333 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 vs 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 vs 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 vs 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 vs 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 vs 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 vs 3581 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 vs 1307 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Etwa 64% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3340
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3340
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3340 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 | 1307 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Kepler | Kepler |
| Codename | GK104 | GK106 |
| Startdatum | 30 May 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 515 | 740 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $449.99 | $349.99 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.45 | 14.35 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1046 MHz | 980 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | 1536 | 960 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,333 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 98 °C | |
| Leitungssysteme | 1536 | 960 |
| Texturfüllrate | 134 billion / sec | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Minimale empfohlene Systemleistung | 600 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | One 6-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 224.3 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| SLI | ||
