NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q und NVIDIA TITAN V Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7.1x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 270.561
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 vs 3583.136
- 7.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 20.669
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3716
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 4193
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3716
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 4193
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 4193 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN V
- Etwa 63% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 33% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Etwa 74% höhere Leitungssysteme: 5120 vs 2944
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19743 vs 13064
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 862 vs 527
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156591 vs 83908
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 22.75
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1116.69
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 vs 7823
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 vs 2944 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19743 vs 13064 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 862 vs 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156591 vs 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1116.69 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 vs 7823 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13064 | 19743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 862 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83908 | 156591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 | 13249 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU104B | GV100 |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 148 | 151 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1095 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2944 | 5120 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,899 gflops | |
Texturfüllrate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 12000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 652.8 GB / s |