NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 270.561
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 vs 3583.136
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 20.669
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 4193
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 4193
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7784 vs 3565
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 vs 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 vs 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 vs 3565 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 74% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2944
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 12935
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 vs 519
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 vs 84332
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 22.75
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1116.69
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2944 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 vs 12935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 vs 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 vs 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1116.69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12935 | 19673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 | 155548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 | 3565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104B | GV100 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 135 | 157 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 652.8 GB / s | |
