NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 270.561
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 vs 3583.136
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 20.669
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 4193
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 4193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 4193 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 74% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2944
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19976 vs 13037
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 526
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156591 vs 83908
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 22.75
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1116.69
- Around 69% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 vs 7823
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2944 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19976 vs 13037 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 526 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156591 vs 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1116.69 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 vs 7823 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13037 | 19976 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83908 | 156591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 | 13249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU104B | GV100 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 151 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 652.8 GB / s |