NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 7.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 270.561
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 versus 3583.136
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 20.669
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 versus 15401
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3716
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 4193
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 versus 15401
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3716
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 4193
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7784 versus 3565
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 versus 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 versus 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 versus 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 versus 3565 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1455 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 74% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 2944
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 versus 12935
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 versus 519
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 versus 84332
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 22.75
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1116.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2944 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 versus 12935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 versus 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 versus 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1116.69 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12935 | 19673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 | 155548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 | 3565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU104B | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 135 | 157 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
