NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 7.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 270.561
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 versus 3583.136
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 20.669
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 versus 15401
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3716
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 4193
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 versus 15401
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3716
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 4193
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 versus 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 4193 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1455 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 74% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 2944
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19743 versus 13064
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 862 versus 527
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 156591 versus 83908
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 22.75
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1116.69
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 versus 7823
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2944 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19743 versus 13064 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 862 versus 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156591 versus 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1116.69 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 versus 7823 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13064 | 19743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 862 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83908 | 156591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 | 13249 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU104B | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 151 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s |