NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- 2057.7x mehr Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- 4.2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 1152
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 9796
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 772
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 32384
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 115.073
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1325.07
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 8.057
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 31.946
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 425.709
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 10566
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3697
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3338
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 10566
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3697
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3338
- 17.1x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 156
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 August 2016 |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 1152 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 9796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 32384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 115.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 31.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 425.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 156 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1708 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4.6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1708 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 9796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 32384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 115.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 31.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 425.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 156 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP106 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 August 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $199 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 388 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 4,400 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,935 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 250 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |