NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 und AMD Radeon HD 7570 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1320 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 12756.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 7.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 480
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 17% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz
- 27.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 614
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 256
- 56.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 1550
- 61.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 4.874
- 15.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 259.769
- 59.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 0.487
- 13.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 14.033
- 20.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 57.396
- 16.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 1389
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2724
- 16.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 1389
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2724
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 5 January 2012 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 480 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 7570
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
Codename | GA106 | Turks |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 5 January 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 134 | 1254 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz | 650 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 170 Watt | 60 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 716 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 624 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 360 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1600 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | DDR3, GDDR5 |