NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1320 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 199.0 GTexel/s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- 7.5x plus de pipelines: 3584 versus 480
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 40 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1600 MHz
- 27.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 614
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 256
- 56.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 versus 1550
- 61.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 4.874
- 15.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 259.769
- 59.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 0.487
- 13.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 14.033
- 20.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 versus 57.396
- 16.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 versus 1389
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2724
- 16.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 versus 1389
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2724
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 5 January 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 480 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 versus 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 versus 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 versus 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GA106 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 5 January 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 1254 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 716 million |
Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | DDR3, GDDR5 |