NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 25% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1320 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 5870.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- 9.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 12x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- 375x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
- 9.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 1749
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 368
- 19.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 4493
- 23.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 12.582
- 11x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 364.463
- 22.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 1.254
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 18.386
- 49.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 23.499
- 8.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 2663
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3478
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3332
- 8.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 2663
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3478
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3332
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 545
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 27 November 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 384 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 545 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 2.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 64 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 545 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Kepler |
Codename | GA106 | GK106 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 27 November 2013 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | $109 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 134 | 1003 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $144.81 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 170 Watt | 64 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 384 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 812.5 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | One 6-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Höhe | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 360 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 5.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |