NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Leitungssysteme: 5120 vs 4864
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 80 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 311.869
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 vs 35.311
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 125
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3717
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3360
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3717
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3360
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 vs 4864 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 vs 125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 vs 3360 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Etwa 81% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Etwa 29% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Etwa 23% höhere Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
- Etwa 17% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20555 vs 15499
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 650
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107152 vs 89617
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4657.322 vs 4619.617
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1477.456 vs 1410.887
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 24877
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 24877
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11652 vs 10434
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20555 vs 15499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 vs 89617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 vs 4619.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 vs 1410.887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 24877 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 vs 10434 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15499 | 20555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89617 | 107152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10434 | 11652 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 80 | 101 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1290 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 780 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 206.4 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 12-pin |
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 384.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |