NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 1525.9x mehr Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s
- Um etwa 25% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 16357
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 921
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 77476
- Etwa 81% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 252.601
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 3949.565
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 24.769
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1322.129
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 14699
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 14699
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4420 vs 2134
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 14699 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 vs 2134 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Etwa 42% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 225 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 175.219
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 2134 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | RDNA |
Codename | GA102 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | $400 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 56 | 162 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 | |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 320 Watt | 225 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 10.3 B |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 760.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |