NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 und NVIDIA TITAN V Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 35% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1815 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3583.136
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 20.669
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 15401
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 15401
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 7 December 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN V
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 16042
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 749
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 105171
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 226.447
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 25.476
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1106.12
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3358
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3358
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 vs 10685
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 vs 16042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 vs 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 vs 10685 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16042 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 13111 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU104 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 7 December 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,299 | $2,999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 154 | 149 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,899 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
Texturfüllrate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 652.8 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 3072 Bit | |
Speichertyp | HBM2 |