NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3583.136
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 20.669
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 15401
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 15401

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 16063
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 749
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 105171
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 226.447
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 25.476
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1106.12
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3358
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3358
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 vs 10685

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16063 19884
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	749 868
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 150662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.447 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4161.764 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.476 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.544 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106.12 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	10685 13111

Compare specifications (specs)