NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 vs 3583.136
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 110.761 vs 20.669
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 15401
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 15401
• 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 3565

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 15652
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 vs 705
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 vs 105171
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 26.999
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1370.281
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3358
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15652 19673
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	705 919
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 155548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.203 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3728.248 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.999 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	110.761 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1370.281 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	10685 3565

Compare specifications (specs)