NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3583.136
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 versus 20.669
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 15401
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 15401
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 7 December 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 versus 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 versus 16059
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 versus 749
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 versus 105171
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 226.447
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 25.476
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1106.12
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 versus 3358
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 versus 3358
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 versus 10685
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 versus 16059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 versus 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 versus 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 versus 10685 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 13111 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU104 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 7 December 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | $2,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 154 | 149 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 3072 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |