NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 und NVIDIA Quadro GV100 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 27% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1132 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1628 MHz
- 8.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 141.066
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1132 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1628 MHz |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 vs 141.066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 18544
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 848 vs 785
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 143963 vs 74179
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 vs 488.989
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 vs 1534.582
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 18544 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 848 vs 785 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 143963 vs 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 vs 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 vs 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 19571 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 143963 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3503 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Volta |
| Codename | TU102 | GV100 |
| Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $6,299 | $8,999 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 124 | 93 |
| Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,817 gflops | |
| Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 870.4 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 4096 Bit | |
| Speichertyp | HBM2 | |

