NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 8.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 18 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 38.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2238 vs 58
- 38.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2238 vs 58
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 vs 58 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Etwa 60% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1365 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 3.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 3072 vs 1024
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 40% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 9851
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 2476
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 9851
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 2476
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 3072 vs 1024 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 2476 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 58 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Turing |
| Codename | TU117 | TU104 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 350 | 178 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
| Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 13600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
| Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile mit anderen
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
