NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 38.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2238 vs 58
- 38.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2238 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 9851
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 2476
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 9851
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 2476
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 9851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 9851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 2476 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 58 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU117 | TU104 |
Place in performance rating | 350 | 178 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |