NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile und NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Etwa 33% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1024 vs 768
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7790 vs 6696
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 469 vs 438
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39487 vs 33766
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 8878
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 8878
Spezifikationen | |
Leitungssysteme | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7790 vs 6696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 vs 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39487 vs 33766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 8878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 8878 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Etwa 44% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:795 / 1230 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1455 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 6.4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2238
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2238
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2238 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7790 | 6696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 | 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39487 | 33766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 8878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 8878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3359 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU117 | N19P-Q1 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 369 | 371 |
Typ | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Startdatum | 27 May 2019 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 91.20 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |