NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 8% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1020 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Texturfüllrate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
- Etwa 33% höhere Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 384
- Etwa 50% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,111 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 1330
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 244
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 4267
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 15.67
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 251.09
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.144
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 10.872
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 13.423
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 2351
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3520
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 2351
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3520
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 461
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 February 2014 vs 9 January 2013 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 384 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,111 gflops vs 742.7 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 vs 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 vs 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 vs 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 vs 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 vs 461 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Etwa 10% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 802.4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 4012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 461 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Codename | GM107 | GK107 |
| Startdatum | 18 February 2014 | 9 January 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 724 | 1141 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $150.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz | 941 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | 512 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,111 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | 384 |
| Texturfüllrate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
| 7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
| Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.0 GB/s | 4012 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
| Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||

