AMD A10-5800K vs AMD FX-8120
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-5800K and AMD FX-8120 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5800K
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1492 vs 1330
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 523 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs October 2011 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 vs 1330 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 vs 480 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8120
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4631 vs 2954
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2092 vs 1469
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.468 vs 4.37
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18 vs 9.891
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.38 vs 0.206
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.898 vs 0.594
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.613 vs 3.484
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 4096 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4631 vs 2954 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2092 vs 1469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.468 vs 4.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18 vs 9.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.38 vs 0.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.898 vs 0.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.613 vs 3.484 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-5800K
CPU 2: AMD FX-8120
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-5800K | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 | 1330 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 | 4631 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 | 480 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 | 2092 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.37 | 7.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.891 | 18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.206 | 0.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.594 | 0.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 | 5.613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A10-5800K | AMD FX-8120 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Trinity | Zambezi |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | October 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | |
Place in performance rating | 1887 | 2675 |
Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD8120FRGUBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8120FRW8KGU | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.43 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
Transistor count | 1303 Million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
Maximum core temperature | 61°C | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions |