AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A12-9720P

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9620P and AMD A12-9720P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A10-9620P

AMD A12-9720P

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9620P

CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later

Launch date	1 January 2017 vs 1 June 2016

Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9720P

Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1306 vs 1261
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2638 vs 2521
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 397 vs 384
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1103 vs 1040
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1403 vs 983
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 887
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6187 vs 4373
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1403 vs 983
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 887
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6187 vs 4373

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1306 vs 1261
PassMark - CPU mark	2638 vs 2521
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	397 vs 384
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1103 vs 1040
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1403 vs 983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6187 vs 4373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1403 vs 983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6187 vs 4373

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A12-9720P

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1261

1306

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2521

2638

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

384

397

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1040

1103

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

1403

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

6187

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

1403

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

6187

Name	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A12-9720P
PassMark - Single thread mark	1261	1306
PassMark - CPU mark	2521	2638
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384	397
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040	1103
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	887	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4373	6187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	887	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4373	6187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		9.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		130.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		44.985

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A12-9720P
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge	Bristol Ridge
Launch date	1 January 2017	1 June 2016
Place in performance rating	1805	1301
Series	Bristol Ridge	AMD Bristol Ridge
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	250 mm	250 mm
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	90 °C
Maximum frequency	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	4	4
Transistor count	3100 Million	3100 Million
Compatibility
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Sockets supported		FP4