AMD A10-9620P versus AMD A12-9720P

Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-9620P et AMD A12-9720P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A10-9620P

versus

AMD A12-9720P

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-9620P

CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard

Date de sortie	1 January 2017 versus 1 June 2016

Raisons pour considerer le AMD A12-9720P

Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1306 versus 1261
Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2638 versus 2521
Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 397 versus 384
Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1103 versus 1040
Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1403 versus 983
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 versus 887
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6187 versus 4373
Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1403 versus 983
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 versus 887
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6187 versus 4373

Caractéristiques
Fréquence maximale	3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark	1306 versus 1261
PassMark - CPU mark	2638 versus 2521
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	397 versus 384
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1103 versus 1040
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1403 versus 983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857 versus 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6187 versus 4373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1403 versus 983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857 versus 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6187 versus 4373

Comparer les références

CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A12-9720P

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1261

1306

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2521

2638

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

384

397

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1040

1103

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

1403

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

6187

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

1403

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

6187

Nom	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A12-9720P
PassMark - Single thread mark	1261	1306
PassMark - CPU mark	2521	2638
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384	397
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040	1103
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	887	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4373	6187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	887	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4373	6187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		9.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		130.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		44.985

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A12-9720P
Essentiel
Nom de code de l’architecture	Bristol Ridge	Bristol Ridge
Date de sortie	1 January 2017	1 June 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1805	1301
Série	Bristol Ridge	AMD Bristol Ridge
Segment vertical	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
Soutien de 64-bit
Taille de dé	250 mm	250 mm
Cache L2	2 MB	2 MB
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Température de noyau maximale	90 °C	90 °C
Fréquence maximale	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Nombre de noyaux	4	4
Nombre de fils	4	4
Compte de transistor	3100 Million	3100 Million
Compatibilité
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Prise courants soutenu		FP4