AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A12-9720P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-9620P und AMD A12-9720P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9620P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
Startdatum | 1 January 2017 vs 1 June 2016 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A12-9720P
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1306 vs 1261
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2638 vs 2521
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 397 vs 384
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1103 vs 1040
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1403 vs 983
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 887
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6187 vs 4373
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1403 vs 983
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 887
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6187 vs 4373
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1306 vs 1261 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2638 vs 2521 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 397 vs 384 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1103 vs 1040 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1403 vs 983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6187 vs 4373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1403 vs 983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6187 vs 4373 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A12-9720P
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-9620P | AMD A12-9720P |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1261 | 1306 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2521 | 2638 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 384 | 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1040 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 983 | 1403 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4373 | 6187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 983 | 1403 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4373 | 6187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 130.347 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.054 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.985 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A10-9620P | AMD A12-9720P | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
Startdatum | 1 January 2017 | 1 June 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1805 | 1301 |
Serie | Bristol Ridge | AMD Bristol Ridge |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Matrizengröße | 250 mm | 250 mm |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90 °C | 90 °C |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 3100 Million |
Kompatibilität |
||
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 |