AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A6-4400M
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9620P and AMD A6-4400M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9620P
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1267 vs 1027
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2538 vs 1013
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 384 vs 331
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1040 vs 484
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 983 vs 496
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 983 vs 496
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2017 vs 15 May 2012 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 vs 1027 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2538 vs 1013 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 384 vs 331 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1040 vs 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 983 vs 496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 983 vs 496 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-4400M
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2268 vs 887
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4945 vs 4373
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2268 vs 887
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4945 vs 4373
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2268 vs 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4945 vs 4373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2268 vs 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4945 vs 4373 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A6-4400M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-9620P | AMD A6-4400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 | 1027 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2538 | 1013 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 384 | 331 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1040 | 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 983 | 496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 | 2268 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4373 | 4945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 983 | 496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 | 2268 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4373 | 4945 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.341 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 123.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.28 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A10-9620P | AMD A6-4400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Trinity |
Launch date | 1 January 2017 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1804 | 1827 |
Series | Bristol Ridge | AMD A-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 250 mm | 246 mm |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 3100 Million | 1303 Million |
L1 cache | 96 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FS1r2 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |