AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A6-4400M

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9620P and AMD A6-4400M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A10-9620P

AMD A6-4400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9620P

CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1275 vs 1023
2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2557 vs 1007
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 384 vs 331
2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1040 vs 484
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 983 vs 496
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 983 vs 496

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 January 2017 vs 15 May 2012
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Maximum frequency	3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
L2 cache	2 MB vs 1024 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1275 vs 1023
PassMark - CPU mark	2557 vs 1007
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384 vs 331
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040 vs 484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983 vs 496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983 vs 496

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-4400M

2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2268 vs 887
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4945 vs 4373
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2268 vs 887
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4945 vs 4373

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2268 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4945 vs 4373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2268 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4945 vs 4373

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A6-4400M

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1275

1023

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2557

1007

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

384

331

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1040

484

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

2268

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

4945

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

2268

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

4945

Name	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A6-4400M
PassMark - Single thread mark	1275	1023
PassMark - CPU mark	2557	1007
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384	331
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040	484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983	496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	887	2268
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4373	4945
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983	496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	887	2268
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4373	4945
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		3.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		123.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.28
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		0.585

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A6-4400M
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge	Trinity
Launch date	1 January 2017	15 May 2012
Place in performance rating	1726	1766
Series	Bristol Ridge	AMD A-Series
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	250 mm	246 mm
L2 cache	2 MB	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	90 °C
Maximum frequency	3.4 GHz	3.2 GHz
Number of cores	4	2
Number of threads	4
Transistor count	3100 Million	1303 Million
L1 cache		96 KB
Compatibility
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Sockets supported		FS1r2
Advanced Technologies
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)