AMD A4-3300M vs AMD A8-3500M
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300M and AMD A8-3500M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300M
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 257 vs 250
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.281 vs 1.766
- 24.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.466 vs 4.312
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 257 vs 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.281 vs 1.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.466 vs 4.312 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3500M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 809 vs 790
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1397 vs 714
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 753 vs 471
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.099 vs 0.06
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.745 vs 1.097
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.056 vs 5.196
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 809 vs 790 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1397 vs 714 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 753 vs 471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.099 vs 0.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.745 vs 1.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.056 vs 5.196 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-3300M
CPU 2: AMD A8-3500M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A4-3300M | AMD A8-3500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 790 | 809 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 714 | 1397 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 257 | 250 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 471 | 753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.281 | 1.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.466 | 4.312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.06 | 0.099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.097 | 1.745 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.196 | 8.056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 805 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2610 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 805 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2610 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5455 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A4-3300M | AMD A8-3500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Llano |
Launch date | 14 June 2011 | 14 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 2932 | 1850 |
Series | AMD A-Series | AMD A-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 226 mm | 218 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1000 Million | 1000 Million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FS1 | FS1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |