AMD A4-3300M vs AMD Turion X2 RM-75

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300M and AMD Turion X2 RM-75 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD A4-3300M

AMD Turion X2 RM-75

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300M

CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 14% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 790 vs 770
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 714 vs 708
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.281 vs 0.959
58.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.466 vs 1.774

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	14 June 2011 vs 1 January 2009
Maximum frequency	2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 65 nm
L2 cache	2048 KB vs 1 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	790 vs 770
PassMark - CPU mark	714 vs 708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.281 vs 0.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	104.466 vs 1.774

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 RM-75

3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 930 vs 257
3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1646 vs 471
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.066 vs 0.06

Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	930 vs 257
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1646 vs 471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.066 vs 0.06

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300M
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 RM-75

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

790

770

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

714

708

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

257

930

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

471

1646

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

2.281

0.959

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

104.466

1.774

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.06

0.066

Name	AMD A4-3300M	AMD Turion X2 RM-75
PassMark - Single thread mark	790	770
PassMark - CPU mark	714	708
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	257	930
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	471	1646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.281	0.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	104.466	1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.06	0.066
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.196

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A4-3300M	AMD Turion X2 RM-75
Essentials
Architecture codename	Llano	Lion
Launch date	14 June 2011	1 January 2009
Place in performance rating	2922	2910
Series	AMD A-Series	2x AMD Turion
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	226 mm
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	256 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	1 MB
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	65 nm
Maximum frequency	2.5 GHz	2.2 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	2
Transistor count	1000 Million
Front-side bus (FSB)		4000 MHz
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	FS1	S1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Advanced Technologies
PowerNow